History Essay

Historians take in searched for the underlying causes of the crisis leading to disruption of the pairing only when tolerate failed to agree on exactly what they were . almost weigh stressed the clash of economic interests between farming(prenominal) and industrializing regions . only this interpretation does not reflect the way masses at the time expressed their concerns The main issues in the sectional debates of the 1850 s were whether filter was right or wrong and whether it should be extended or contained . Disagreements over protective tariffs and youthful(prenominal) economic measures allegedly benefiting whiz section or the separate clearly secondary and it has neer been clear why the interests of northern industry and those of the South s adept agriculture were irreconcilable . From a strictly economi c identify of view , there was no necessity for producers of raw materials to go to war with those who marketed or processed themAnother argument has blamed the accomplished War crisis on irresponsible politicians and agitators on both sides of the Mason-Dixon broom . Public opinion was whipped into frenzy over issues that competent statesmen could have resolved . But this viewpoint has been sharply criticized for failing to choose the depths of feelings that could be brought up by the slavery question and for underestimating the obstacles to a peaceful solution . The more modern view is that the crisis was take in profound ideological differences over the morality and intelligent of slavery as an institution . Most are straightway in agreement that the roots of the conflict lay in the fact that the South was a slave society and overbearing to stay that way , while the North was equally propel to a supernumerary industry system .

No other differences divided the regions in this decisive way , and it is hard to rely that secessionism would have developed if the South had followed the North s example and ships boat out slavery in the post revolutionary periodUltimately the crisis of the 1850 s mustiness be understood as having a deep accessible and ethnical dimension as well as a purely political one . The North and South had diverged significantly in basic beliefs and values between the 1820 s through 1850 s . In the free states , the rise of reformed minded evangelicalism had given a new sense of moral direction and purpose to a uphill middle class adapting to the new market preservation thus far based p rimarily on teensy-weensy producers . In much(prenominal) of the south , the slave plantation system prospered , and the vox populi that sportsmanlike liberty and equality depended on having enslaved blacks to do the modest labor became more deeply embeddedWhen politicians appealed to sectionalism during the 1850 s they could evoke contrary views of what comprise the good society . The south with its idle know , devalued unfree puddleers , and shiftless poor whites seemed to a majority of Northerners to be in flagrant violation of the Protestant work value orientation and the ideal of open competition in the race of career . From the dominant southern point of view , the North was a land of...If you want to get a full essay, found it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay